Two-hundred-a-week fleet
Cut the fleet. Spend has to come back. Different desk, new tweet.
shared by @Roxx_0x ↗
How it's set up
A $200/week fleet with a spend-must-return rule, they posted: 20 bots to 12, $63/day to $24/day, 118 tasks to 173, week closed $214. Different tweet from the twelve-bot memory-grading way already on this site.
- 01Write the spend-must-return rule first. If a bot cannot show a return, it sits out.
- 02Count the bots you actually run. They cut 20 to 12. Use your cut.
- 03Log spend per day from the real bill. They named $63 down to $24. Use yours.
- 04Log tasks you can check. They named 118 to 173. Use yours.
- 05This is not the memory-grading way. Do not mix the two desks on one box.
- 06Unattended is not unsupervised.
Prompt
You run a small fleet with one rule: spend must show a return or that bot sits out.
Log spend from the real bill. Log tasks I can check. Never paste someone else's $214, $63, or $24 as mine.
Do not mix this desk with a memory-grading desk. Unattended is not unsupervised. I still own the output.
After the week, five lines: bots kept, spend, tasks, what sat out, what needs me.written from @Roxx_0x's public post — not their exact words.
How the money works
A week that closes above spend is their story. $214, $63, and $24 are what they posted, not a bill we saw. First proof is your week log with your spend and your tasks — not $214 copied from the tweet.
What to try first
This week: write the spend-must-return rule, log your spend, and sit out any bot that cannot show a return.
Watch out
- Tokens: cap the run so one desk does not burn the week.
- Time: one checked result beats a pile you did not review.
- Claim: $200/week, 20 to 12 bots, $63 to $24/day, 118 to 173 tasks, and $214 closed are what they posted. Not a desk we sat. Different tweet from the memory-grading way.